Allison’s last Will made in 1997 named her husband as sole Executor and beneficiary, and he was named as sole beneficiary of her +$800,000 insurance policies.
Under the “forfeiture rule” – where a person is found guilty of murder, manslaughter or “unlawfully killing” another person, the offender cannot benefit from the deceased following the killing, as in the above matter, receiving benefit under the victim’s Will. The offender “forfeits” any potential benefit.
On application of the rule, the offender becomes disqualified from having any interest in the victim’s assets, including superannuation and life insurance, and is ineligible to benefit from the principle of survivorship. The estate will be administered as if the offender’s interests in the estate do not exist or as if those gifts have been struck out.
In February 2017, by application of the forfeiture rule, the Brisbane Supreme Court ordered that Gerard Baden-Clay had no right to his wife’s estate due to his conviction, despite being name sole Executor and beneficiary, and ordered Allison’s father as Executor and trustee.
In May 2017, the Federal Court of Australia ordered for Allison’s $800,000 insurance policies, which did not form part of her estate, to be transferred to her estate, and following the removal of Baden-Clay as beneficiary in her Will, for the estate to be divided equally between their three children.
This last case now brings an end to the 5 years of criminal and civil litigation in what is clearly a tragic case for all involved.