Adrian Corbould: Will alterations, liquid nightmare, also known as the most expensive bottle of liquid paper.
Hi, I’m Adrian Corbould, Accredited Specialist, Wills & Estates at Turnbull Hill. An example of the kind of work I handle. Recently, a lady came to me, I’ll call her Julia. She gave me two wills. The first will was a photocopy of a will that was perfectly made. She was named the coexecutor and she received a substantial cash benefit in that will.
It was also executed perfectly. The will-maker signed it and it was witnessed by two people. She also gave me another will which was a photocopy of the same will but on it, there was an alteration. There was a significant difference. Someone, possibly the will-maker, got some liquid paper and whited out her name, where she was the executor, and whited out her gift. Underneath that, there were handwritten words that said, with an arrow pointing to the liquid paper, “This is what I want”, and some initials, the initials of the will-maker.
that was an alteration to the original will. What the law says is that when you
alter a valid will, that alteration is not valid unless the alteration has been
executed as if it was a will. That means, it has to have been signed by the
will-maker and has to have been witnessed by two people. That would mean, for
that amendment or that alteration to be valid, there would signatures all over
it. It would be a hell of a mess but it could still be deemed to be valid.
Whoever is going
to probate that will is going to have a heck of a time in convincing a court
that that is the valid last will because the will-maker did not do the addons
bits of having it re-executed. As we’ve talked about in the past, a will has to
be in writing, and it has to be signed by the will-maker and witnessed by two
people. If those things aren’t done, questions are raised by the court and the
person propounding the will for probate will have to put on a tonne of additional evidence to prove that the will-maker
intended for that document to be their last will.
What’s going to
happen in this matter is there’s going to be a probably very long-drawn-out
legal argument, possibly costing a lot of money to determine what did the
deceased last intend. Because it could be construed that that wasn’t his last
will, that he was just revising it, didn’t have a plan to make it his last
will, any number of questions.
Anyway, what can be done to avoid that? Very simply, make a valid will and if you want to amend it, you either get it re-executed or preferably, just make a whole fresh new will from scratch. That’d be the best thing.
Hope this has been of some interest. Talk again next time.